Texas Law Enforcement Officials Asking Legislature to Pass Bills to Prevent Wrongful Convictions
The AP is reporting that some Texas police chiefs are supporting a measure that would allow taking DNA from supspects arrested for mid-level demeanors and up (including offenses like indecent exposure or check fraud). They also are supporting a measure that would set legal standards for how eye witness evidence can be collected by police. The ACLU has gotten involved in the debate, calling the measure and "outrageous invasion of privacy."
Austin Police Chief Art Acevedo is among the law enforcement officials pushing to collect DNA from suspects in Class B misdemeanors. Their plan could mean sampling more than 800,000 people a year, some of whom may never be convicted or even go to trial.
Experts say that while a few states take DNA in misdemeanors involving sex crimes, none has gone as far as the Texas idea. The American Civil Liberties Union worries that police might make arrests just to fish for a DNA match.
"We think this is an outrageous invasion of privacy," said Rebecca Bernhardt, policy director of the American Civil Liberties Union of Texas.
"This is a step in the direction of creating a DNA database of every person in Texas, which is something Texans should be against," she said. "DNA is the most basic and private information a person has."
Austin Police Chief Arthur Acevedo says the samples would help police find criminals and exclude innocent people. The DNA proposal would include destroying records when charges are dropped or someone is acquitted at trial, Acevedo said.
"DNA has proven to be a tool that has gone a long way in proving the innocence of wrongly convicted individuals," Acevedo said, noting the Cole case. "This is an opportunity to eliminate people early on."
While the debate about the constitutionality of taking DNA from all mid-level misdemeanor arrestees will certainly develop in the next few months, it is the Center's position that the second measure is appropriate, if it is not too overreaching. By implementing procedures on lineups and eyewitness identification, the police will at least have some guidance about appropriate measures to take. These types of policies can help to limit misidentification by eye-witneses, which is the # 1 cause of wrongful convictions. However, if the policy is too far overreaching, it would in effect limit the police officer's ability to do his job, possibly putting the public at risk.
It seems criminals and those attorneys whom make money off this new found type of ambulance chasing is always worried the law will be applied to criminals. If law is allowed to define criminals or criminal actions, the ACLU will vaporize in a month.
The ACLU must be stopped, as they are subversive to our American way, which is preserved through rule of law. Every day one can find new loopholes in the same law they read another way the day before. Who ever wins is the one with the biggest bank roll. Local government does not have the funds the ACLU has collected from taxpayer coffers. They have won only by deceit and twisting the law and forcing out of court settlements due to lack of funds and they know it.
What a strategy, beat the public majority with their own money.