Jury Rules In Favor Of Chicago Police - Finds Shooting Of Michael Dunbar Was Justified - Rejects Family's Claim For $4 Million

 A federal jury has ruled that a Chicago Police Officer was justified in shooting and killing Michael Dunbar when Dunbar drove his car while dragging the Officer, whose arm was trapped in the car window. Dunbar and a female passenger were in a car when approached by the Officer. Dunbar, who had a .12 blood alcohol level, drove the car onto the sidewalk hitting the Officer. The Officer ordered Dunbar to stop and reached into the car to try and take the keys but Dunbar grabbed the Officer's arm and then put the car in reverse and then forward, driving away with the Officer's arm hooked in the car window. With the car accelerating, the Officer shot Dunbar, killing him. The Officer suffered injuries, including a concussion, which required hospitalization. You can read more about the underlying incident HERE. At the civil trial, Dunbar's family claimed the Officer was not justified in shooting Dunbar and asked the jury to award the family $4,000,000. The jury rejected the plaintiff's claims and found in favor of the Chicago Police, who were represented by attorneys Josh Enquist and Jordan Marsh from the City of Chicago Corporation Counsel's office. Dunbar's family was represented by attorney Russell Ainsworth from the firm of Loevy & Loevy.

Justice Is Served - Shawn Gaston Found Guilty Of Murdering Chicago Police Officer Alejandro Valadez. Jury Rejects Defense Attorney John Paul Carroll's Nonsense.

 The Chicago Sun Times reports that a jury tonight has found Shawn Gaston guilty of murdering Chicago police officer Alejandro Valadez. Earlier today, on the last day of trial, the jury was shown a videotape of Gaston confessing to shooting Valadez. Police found a .40 caliber gun along with a rifle and the .357 weapon tied to Valadez's murder in the trunk of Gaston's car. Gaston had denied driving that car, but the evidence showed that Gaston had received a traffic ticket in the very same vehicle just an hour before the shooting. State's Attorney Anita Alvarez told the jury during closing arguments that the "police did their job in this case and they followed the evidence." Gaston's attorney, John Paul Carroll, continued with his nonsense during the closing arguments by referencing the Salem Witch Trial, the ancient Roman philosopher Cicero and the Nazi "hero" of Nanking. He also claimed the guns were planted. Yeah, right. Carroll apparently had no explanation for the videotaped confession. Glad to see that justice was swiftly served. Gaston's co-defendants, Kevin Walker and Christopher Harris , are still awaiting trial.

Andrew M. Hale & Associates Wins NINTH Chicago Police Trial This Year

 The law firm of Andrew M. Hale & Associates won its ninth Chicago police trial this year. The most recent victory came in a case brought by plaintiffs Melvin Wiley and Darnell Russell. Details of that case appear in the blog post below. The trial team for the latest victory was Avi Kamionski, James McGovern and Cherie Getchell. Judge Hart presided over the case which took place at the Dirksen Federal Building in Chicago.

Jury Rules In Favor Of Chicago Police - Rejects Marvin Wiley's Story

 On February 22, 2007, Chicago police officers Damen Balesteri, Dennis Oboikovitz, Sharmaun Freeman and Shaun McGovern arrested Melvin Wiley after he was observed selling drugs on the 6200 block of South Laflin on the south side of Chicago. Officer Balesteri observed Wiley conduct two hand-to-hand transactions while conducting a drug surveillance from an abandoned building across the street. Wiley told a very different story, claiming that he had two of his friends, Darnell Russell and Sydney Hunter, came to the 6200 block of S. Laflin because Wiley was going to take his young daughter out to celebrate her birthday. Wiley and Russell claimed that the officers pulled them out of Russell's car at gun point and placed them in handcuffs. Wiley, Russell and other witnesses claimed that while in police custody on Laflin, one of the officers put his finger in Russell's rectum, causing Russell to have a seizure. Wiley and Russell claimed that the police officers just left Russell on the street to die after allegedly having this seizure. Russell and Wiley marched their family members into court to testify on their behalf but they could not keep their stories straight.  Russell's mom had claimed she witnessed her son on Laflin after having a seizure but it was shown that she was actually at work at the time of the incident. Russell's step-father testified but in his testimony he admitted he never even saw Wiley at the scene of the incident. On the last day of trial, plaintiff's counsel was allowed to call a rebuttal witness to testify there was no abandoned building on the 6200 block of S. Laflin, but on cross-examination it was shown, via Google Maps, that there clearly was an abandoned building on the 6200 block of S. Laflin, consistent with Officer Balesteri's testimony. Russell claimed he went to the hospital relating to this incident but he offered no medical testimony to support his allegations. After deliberating for less than an hour, the jury returned a verdict for the defendant police officers on all counts. The Chicago police officers were represented by attorneys Avi Kamionski, James McGovern and Cherie Getchell from the law firm of Andrew M. Hale & Associates. The plaintiffs were represented by attorneys Sam Adam, Jr. and Jeffrey Neslund.

Andrew M. Hale & Associates Wins Eighth Police Trial This Year

 The law firm of Andrew M. Hale & Associates continues to rack up the trial wins, with the latest coming today when a federal court jury deliberated for little over an hour before finding in favor of three Chicago police officers accused of beating plaintiff Ricky Stevenson in the lock-up after he was arrested for burglary. The officers were represented by attorneys Shneur Nathan, Jonathan Boulahanis and Joan Ahn, who were able to show that two of the three officers were not even present in the police station at the time of the alleged beating. Our attorneys were also able to show, via plaintiff's mugshot and the testimony of the ER doctor, that plaintiff Stevenson did not suffer any injuries, let alone the significant injuries that he claimed. In addition to seeking compensatory damages, plaintiff had asked the jury to impose $30,000 in punitive damages against each of the officers. The jury rejected all of plaintiff's claims. Plaintiff was represented by attorney David Clark. The case was heard before Magistrate Judge Susan E. Cox. This is the eighth police trial victory this year for the trial attorneys at Andrew M. Hale & Associates. 

Federal Jury Finds In Favor Of Two Chicago Police Officers - Rejects Ricky Scott's Claim Of Excessive Force

 After deliberating little more than an hour, a federal jury found in favor of Chicago police officers Kenneth Taylor and Carlie Young in a lawsuit brought by plaintiff Ricky Scott. The Officers, who were working school patrol, received information from a Calumet High School security guard that there was a man with a bandana driving a dark car near the school and scaring students. Shortly after receiving this report, the Officers spotted Scott driving by Calumet High School in a dark colored car wearing a bandana. The Officers pulled Scott over and wound up handcuffing Scott temporarily due to safety reasons when Scott refused to keep his hands on the trunk of his car as the Officers ran his name and plates. Since the Officers could not prove that Scott was the perpetrator, they filled out a contact card and told Scott to leave the area. Scott claimed that the Officers handcuffed him in such a violent manner as to separate both his shoulders. The defense submitted evidence showing that Scott had incurred shoulder injuries from work-related incidents and that Scott had denied having any prior shoulder injuries when questioned during the pendency of the case. The jury rejected Scott's claims of excessive force and battery. The Officers were represented by attorneys Andrew Hale, Avi Kamionski and Helena Wright of the firm of Andrew M. Hale & Associates. 

Jury Rules In Favor Of Two Chicago Police Officers - Rejects False Arrest And Excessive Force Claims

 On Thursday, March 17, after deliberating for little over an hour, a federal jury returned a verdict in favor of Chicago police officers Clifton Thurman and Nataly Janik, rejecting the the claims brought by plaintiffs Marlin Anderson, Marilyn Anderson, Markita Anderson, and Christopher Monroe. On the early morning hours of April 19, 2008, after shots were fired outside a house party at 6702 S. Green Street in Chicago, police responded to a chaotic scene. Marlin Anderson was charged with guns recovered from the first floor of the residence and her daughter Marilyn Anderson was charged with a gun recovered from the second floor of the residence. Christopher Monroe was charged with battery upon a police officer and Markita Anderson was charged with obstruction of a police officer. Plaintiffs brought claims for false arrest, excessive force and malicious prosecution and asked the jury to award them $250,000. The jury rejected all of plaintiff's claims and returned a verdict in favor of Officers Thurman and Janik. The Chicago police officers were represented by Andrew Hale and Jonathan Boulahanis of the law firm of Andrew M. Hale & Associates. Plaintiffs were represented  by Jeffrey Granich, Josh Friedman and Katie Ehrmin.

Jury Rules In Favor Of Three Chicago Police Officers - Rejects Anthony Mensah's Claims Of An Improper Strip Search

 A federal jury on Thursday, March 17, 2011, swiftly rejected a man's bizarre allegations against 5th District Chicago police officers claiming he was taken into a West Pullman alley and strip searched. Anthony Mensah, a convicted felon, claimed that he was driven to the alley by Officers Rosalind Bowie, Gregory Jones and James Couch and was forced to take his pants off for an anal cavity search. Notably, the search Mensah said happened in the alley was identical to an intake search he experienced in Cook County Jail as a result of a 2007 theft arrest. The jury quickly returned a verdict in favor of the officers, who said that they merely interviewed Mensah because he matched a description of a drug dealer provided to them by a concerned citizen. During the interview, Mensah yelled about his disdain for police because he lost his trucking job after he was arrested for stealing his truck and its merchandise. The Chicago police officers were represented by Shneur Nathan and Joan Ahn of Andrew M. Hale & Associates. Thomas Morrissey represented the plaintiff.

Jury Rejects Oscar Walden's Claim Of A Coerced Confession

After a week long trial, a federal jury rejected Oscar Walden's claim that the police coerced his confession to rape back in 1952. Walden was arrested in January 1952 when an employee at a drug store called the police and said that he looked like the person depicted in a police sketch who was wanted for rape. Once brought to the police station, Walden was identified by the rape victim as being the man who attacked her. The next day, Walden gave a confession to police officers. Walden was convicted at his criminal trial and spent 14 years in prison before being released on parole in 1965. In 1978, then Governor James Thompson gave Walden a general pardon. Thereafter, Walden sought an "innocence" pardon on several occasions but was denied each time. However, in 2002, Governor George Ryan gave Walden an "innocence" pardon, despite the fact there was no new evidence of innocence. At the time, the rape victim and all the police officers and states attorneys involved in the 1952 criminal trial were deceased. That innocence pardon allowed Walden to file a civil lawsuit against the City of Chicago wherein Walden claimed that his confession was coerced by physical and mental mistreatment at the hands of Chicago police officers. Walden testified at his civil trial, as did his former attorney George Leighton and an expert witness named Joseph Lipari who opined that the City of Chicago had a policy and practice of coercing confessions from criminal suspects in 1952. Since the police officers, state's attorneys and rape victim were all deceased, but had been subjected to cross-examination at Walden's criminal trial, the defense used actors and presented their criminal trial testimony to the civil jury. After deliberating less than one day, the jury rejected Walden's claims and found in favor of the City of Chicago. The jury specifically found that the police officers had not coerced Walden's confession. Walden's attorneys had asked the jury to award him $15 million. The City of Chicago was represented by attorneys Andrew M. Hale and Avi Kamionski from the law firm of Andrew M. Hale & Associates. Walden was represented by Flint Taylor and John Stainthorp from the Peoples Law Office.

Chicago Police Officers Win Again

 After three years of litigation, on February 4, 2011, a federal jury confirmed that three Chicago tactical officers from the 10th District properly arrested Jeremy Venson for selling rock cocaine on the corner of 13th Street and Keeler. The case began on November 2, 2007, when Officers Lazaro Altamirano, Christopher Jania, and John O'Keefe arrested Mr. Venson after they heard him yelling "rocks, rocks" to passing vehicle traffic. Mr. Venson was found to be in possession of cocaine. Judge James Brown emboldened Mr. Venson when he made a finding of no probable cause at the preliminary hearing and the charges were dismissed. According to Assistant State's Attorney Eric Bashirian, the prosecutor assigned to Judge Brown's courtroom for the preliminary hearing, drug charges that involve only 0.1 or 0.2 grams are routinely dismissed in the Cook County Criminal Courts because it's impractical to bring every one of these cases to trial. The way these charges are dismissed, Mr. Bashirian says, is through a judicial finding of no probable cause. Even though Mr. Bashirian's testimony and Mr. Venson's extensive criminal background was excluded at trial, the jury read through it all and made its own finding: the defendant Officers clearly had probable cause to arrest Mr. Venson. The presiding judge was the Honorable Ruben Castillo of the Northern District of Illinois. Attorneys Irene Dymkar and James Bowers represented plaintiff Venson. Attorneys Shneur Nathan and Helena Wright of Andrew M. Hale & Associates represented the defendant Officers.

Jury Rules In Favor Of Seven Chicago Police Officers

 On January 18, 2011, after a week long trial before the Honorable Virginia Kendall, a federal court jury found that seven Chicago police officers were not liable on all counts in a civil rights lawsuit brought by plaintiff Gregory Smith. Smith had alleged that the police officers used excessive force and stomped on his hand, causing a dislocation of his ring finger. He also alleged that several officers failed to intervene during the alleged beating and that he was denied medical attention. The jury rejected all of Smith's claims. Key evidence in the case was the fact that the medical evidence showed that it was impossible for Smith's finger to become dislocated due to the stomping he claimed, that Smith had plead guilty to the narcotics offenses he was arrested for, and the testimony of the officers that Smith resisted their attempts to arrest him and had to be pulled from a fence that Smith would  not let go of. Smith was represented by attorneys Jeff Neslund, Rob Robertson, and Mike Robbins. The police officers were represented by attorneys Shneur Nathan, Jonathan Boulahanis and Monifa Gray from the firm Andrew M. Hale & Associates.

Federal Jury Rejects Frivolous Lawsuit Brought Against Chicago Police

CHICAGO - A Federal Jury in Chicago refused to award any money to Larry Nelson, a chicago man who claimed he was pulled over for no reason.  Larry Nelson alleged that after was pulling out of a Marathon gas station near the intersection of Iowa and Pulaski he was stopped by four Chicago Police Officers.  Nelson further claimed that the officers came out with their guns drawn and pointed at his face and one officer even threatened to kill him. Nelson even came up with some bizarre story that police were pointing "laser beams" at him. Nelson claimed his car was searched and that police found this campaign poster inside.  It was this campaign poster that made the police "re-think who they were messing with," Larry Nelson said at trial.   Nelson contends that once the police discovered he was a politician and connected to then presidential candidate Barak Obama, the police let him go.  At trial, Nelson testified that he in fact endorsed Barak Obama for president - and that is why he put Obama's name on HIS poster. 

The police officers  - Elizabeth Wilson, Bradley Ruzak, Richard Novotny and Ronald Lis - all denied violating Nelson's rights.  As the encounter was so routine and uneventful, the officers didn't have any recollection of Nelson or his so called Obama connection.  Police maintained they wouldn't stop anyone without reason and highlighted to the Jury that they stopped forty other people that evening an not one person complained of any misconduct. Police records also proved Nelson's account to be wrong.  

This is just one of Nelson's lawsuits against the CIty of Chicago.  Thankfully here, the Jury found the lawsuit to be completely frivolous and vindicated the police officers involved. 

Another WIN for the good guys.

Larry Nelson was represented by Irene Dymkar and James Bowers.  Chicago Police were represented by Avi Kamionski and Cherie Getchell of Andrew M. Hale & Associates.

Jury Rules In Favor Of Chicago Police Officer Richard Pellerano

 

A federal court jury has ruled in favor of Chicago police officer Richard Pellerano in a suit brought by plaintiff Gary Murray. Officer Pellerano and his partner, Chris Cannata, had arrested Murray for possession of crack cocaine, resisting arrest and reckless conduct. Murray claimed he did nothing wrong, and was not in possession of any cocaine. The jury rejected all of Murray's claims (false arrest, excessive force and malicious prosecution) and found in favor of Officer Pellerano. The case was presided over by Judge William J. Hibbler. Officer Pellerano was represented by attorneys Andrew Hale and Jonathan Boulahanis from Andrew M. Hale & Associates in Chicago.

Federal Jury Awards Maria Guzman A Whopping $1 For The "Emotional Distress" She Claims Was Caused By Chicago Police

In 2005, Maria Guzman filed a civil rights lawsuit against Chicago police officers claiming her home was illegally searches and she was unlawfully detained.  Police officers had a valid search warrant. The search warrant was for a single family residence.  After being in Guzman's home for twenty minutes, police officers realized that it was not a single family residence as it appeared from outside - so they left.  Defendants won summary judgment, but the case was reversed by the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals. The Court held that the search was illegal because the officers should have known they were not in a single family home and left earlier.  

At her damages trial, Guzman claimed she was "emotionally distressed" by these twenty minutes. Guzman claimed police put her unborn baby into distress and caused her to have contractions when she was only thirty weeks pregnant. Guzman asked the the jury for thousands of dollars in "medical expenses" and unspecified damages for "emotional distress."  

The jury saw right through it all and came back in under two hours  with a $1 verdict for the "technical violation."

Mary McCahill, Anne Preston, and Tom Platt of the Corporation Counsel's Office represented the police officers.

Larry Jackowiak, Louis Meyer, and Adele Nicholas represented Guzman.

Another great result!!!  

 

New York Police Officers Acquitted In Anal Assault Case

 A jury acquitted New York police officer Richard Kern of sodomizing a drug suspect with his baton. Two of Kern's colleagues were also acquitted of covering up the alleged anal assault. Kern was quoted as saying "I knew coming into this I was innocent. I was going to stand up for my rights and prove my innocence." 

More On The Detroit Police Officers Victory In Terence Hopkins Case

 

More on the case from the Detroit Free Press.

Sgt. Michael Osman is quoted as follows:

"These false accusations are obviously sick and disgusting. The City of Detroit law department did a great job of presenting this case to the jury and bringing out these lies from drug traffickers and the jury came back with the proper verdict."

Congrats Sgt. Osman. . . 

McHenry County Sheriffs Vindicated In Gary Gauger Wrongful Conviction Case

The Daily Herald is reporting this morning that Three McHenry County Officers have been vindicated by a jury of any misconduct in the Gary Gauger case.

For a dozen years McHenry County Undersheriff Gene Lowery and two former colleagues have lived with allegations they framed an innocent man for the murder of his parents and helped send him to death row for a crime he did not commit. Those claims may have been silenced Thursday night when a jury cleared him and retired detectives Beverly Hendle and Christopher Pandre of malicious prosecution and conspiracy claims brought in a lawsuit by pardoned death row inmate Gary Gauger.

Jurors deliberated nearly five hours before returning the verdicts, which found that even though Gauger was innocent, the detectives had probable cause to arrest him for his parents' 1993 slayings.

Gauger was suing the detectives, and the McHenry County sheriff's department, for $20 million, alleging they falsely reported that he confessed to the murders - acts that ultimately landed him behind bars for 31/2 years, including nine months on death row, before he was exonerated.

On Thursday, it was the detectives claiming vindication.

"Nobody feels good when the criminal justice system fails," Lowery said after the verdict. "Though I feel we've been exonerated, I don't think there's anything to celebrate. "Maybe some of our honor is back," he said. "We were accused of wrongdoing, and we were just doing our jobs."

Gauger, an organic vegetable grower who lives near Richmond, declined to comment on the jury's decision, but his lawyers said they will appeal. "It's a very disappointing verdict," Gauger attorney Matthew Crowl said. "We felt that the evidence was strong, but we understand it's a high burden to meet in a malicious prosecution case." That burden required Gauger to show that not only did the detectives arrest the wrong man but that they did so with an "improper motive" other than bringing the proper person to justice. The jurors declined to comment on their decision as they left the McHenry County courthouse Thursday night. Gauger was living with his parents, Ruth and Morris Gauger, in April 1993 when they were found dead, their throats slashed, on the family farm off Route 173. During 18 hours of questioning, police said, Gauger confessed to the killings. He later was convicted of first-degree murder based largely on that confession and sentenced to death.

About three years later, however, a federal investigation linked two members of the Outlaws motorcycle gang to the murders. Gauger ultimately was released from prison and the charges against him were dismissed. In 2002, he received a full pardon. Gauger testified last week that contrary to the detectives' claims, he never admitted to the murders. Instead, he told jurors, he offered a hypothetical explanation of how he might have done it after detectives falsely told him they had evidence proving he was the killer and suggested he did it during a blackout. He said he repeatedly told investigators he had no memory of harming his parents.

The detectives denied those claims, testifying this week that Gauger never offered a hypothetical explanation and they never lied to him about evidence. During closing arguments, the detectives' attorney, James Sotos, told jurors that it was Gauger's own actions and statements that made him a suspect. "I don't think the police officers misdirected this investigation," he said. "Mr. Gauger misdirected this investigation. There is not a police officer in the world who would not have held an honest and strong suspicion."

More to follow.....

Jerry Miller Followup - Court Holds Lineup Not Suggestive

 As recently reported, the district court granted summary judgment in favor of three retired Chicago police officers who were sued by plaintiff Jerry Miller in a civil rights lawsuit in the Northern District of Illinois. One of Miller's claims was that the police officers conducted an unduly suggestive lineup. The court rejected that argument, stating: "A lineup does not require five persons with identical measurements and countenances. United States v. Funches, 84 F.3d 249, 253 (7th Cir. 1996). It is undisputed that Miller and the other participants in the lineup were males, black, between 5'6" and 6', between 150 and 170 pounds, and between 23 and 31 years old. Miller was the same height as a filler, one inch taller than a filler, and four to five inches shorter than two fillers. He weighed the same as two fillers, was five pounds lighter than a filler, and was 20 pounds lighter than a filler. The parity level establishes the lineup was not unduly suggestive."  (For more information on this case, see the prior blog post).