Anthony Mckinney's Lawyers Seek To Distance Themselves From The Controversial Actions Of Northwestern's Innocence Project Students
The Chicago Tribune is reporting: 
Anthony McKinney's attorneys filed a post-conviction petition yesterday that no longer includes affidavits and videotapes gathered by Medill Innocence Project students. Northwestern hopes that the modified petition will end the states's attorneys efforts to force Northwestern to turn over their grades, grading criteria and notes. "My hope is that by taking out the most controversial evidence in the case that the state will agree" that their subpoenas seeking the information are moot, David Protess said.
As previously reported, McKinney's attorneys have been trying since November 2008 to win him a new day in court. Prosecutors have argued they need the students' material to prepare for the hearing and have filed documents containing accusations by witnesses that the students paid and flirted with them.
Apparently, McKinney believes his petition is strong without this "new evidence." If thats the case, we are not sure why the students had to go out and get it - and allegedly pay for it. Either way, the students should comply with the subpoena and clear their names. If Northwestern really wants McKinney out of prison, a simple subpoena shouldn't stand in the way. If the students did nothing wrong, and there is nothing to hide, why the delay?
What's more important - the documents or McKinney?
News of the Cook County State's Attorney's filed brief, accusing Northwestern University Innocence Project students of paying witnesses in exchange for testimony, has made national headlines. The story was picked up by the 