McHenry County Sheriffs Vindicated In Gary Gauger Wrongful Conviction Case

The Daily Herald is reporting this morning that Three McHenry County Officers have been vindicated by a jury of any misconduct in the Gary Gauger case.

For a dozen years McHenry County Undersheriff Gene Lowery and two former colleagues have lived with allegations they framed an innocent man for the murder of his parents and helped send him to death row for a crime he did not commit. Those claims may have been silenced Thursday night when a jury cleared him and retired detectives Beverly Hendle and Christopher Pandre of malicious prosecution and conspiracy claims brought in a lawsuit by pardoned death row inmate Gary Gauger.

Jurors deliberated nearly five hours before returning the verdicts, which found that even though Gauger was innocent, the detectives had probable cause to arrest him for his parents' 1993 slayings.

Gauger was suing the detectives, and the McHenry County sheriff's department, for $20 million, alleging they falsely reported that he confessed to the murders - acts that ultimately landed him behind bars for 31/2 years, including nine months on death row, before he was exonerated.

On Thursday, it was the detectives claiming vindication.

"Nobody feels good when the criminal justice system fails," Lowery said after the verdict. "Though I feel we've been exonerated, I don't think there's anything to celebrate. "Maybe some of our honor is back," he said. "We were accused of wrongdoing, and we were just doing our jobs."

Gauger, an organic vegetable grower who lives near Richmond, declined to comment on the jury's decision, but his lawyers said they will appeal. "It's a very disappointing verdict," Gauger attorney Matthew Crowl said. "We felt that the evidence was strong, but we understand it's a high burden to meet in a malicious prosecution case." That burden required Gauger to show that not only did the detectives arrest the wrong man but that they did so with an "improper motive" other than bringing the proper person to justice. The jurors declined to comment on their decision as they left the McHenry County courthouse Thursday night. Gauger was living with his parents, Ruth and Morris Gauger, in April 1993 when they were found dead, their throats slashed, on the family farm off Route 173. During 18 hours of questioning, police said, Gauger confessed to the killings. He later was convicted of first-degree murder based largely on that confession and sentenced to death.

About three years later, however, a federal investigation linked two members of the Outlaws motorcycle gang to the murders. Gauger ultimately was released from prison and the charges against him were dismissed. In 2002, he received a full pardon. Gauger testified last week that contrary to the detectives' claims, he never admitted to the murders. Instead, he told jurors, he offered a hypothetical explanation of how he might have done it after detectives falsely told him they had evidence proving he was the killer and suggested he did it during a blackout. He said he repeatedly told investigators he had no memory of harming his parents.

The detectives denied those claims, testifying this week that Gauger never offered a hypothetical explanation and they never lied to him about evidence. During closing arguments, the detectives' attorney, James Sotos, told jurors that it was Gauger's own actions and statements that made him a suspect. "I don't think the police officers misdirected this investigation," he said. "Mr. Gauger misdirected this investigation. There is not a police officer in the world who would not have held an honest and strong suspicion."

More to follow.....

Alleged Spanish Cobra Gang Member Shot And Killed While Riding In Juan Johnson's SUV - Police Seeking To Speak To Johnson

 Rosemary Sobol of the Chicago Sun Times is reporting :

Humboldt Park murder has connection to recent wrongful conviction award
Comments
June 30, 2009
BY ROSEMARY SOBOL Staff Reporter
The Saturday murder of a Berwyn man occurred inside a sport-utility vehicle registered to a man who was recently awarded a record $21 million by a federal jury after he spent 11 years in prison for a murder conviction that was later overturned.

The slaying of 37-year-old Freddy Vasquez, of Berwyn, occurred at 7:06 a.m. on the 2400 block of West North Ave. in the Humboldt Park neighborhood, according to Shakespeare District police Capt. Marc Buslik.

Vasquez was sitting in the rear driver’s side seat of an SUV that is registered to Juan Johnson, who recently was awarded the $21 million award, according to Buslik, who said Johnson was not in the vehicle or on the scene of the incident.

A federal jury awarded the money to Johnson June 22 and attorneys for Johnson, an alleged Spanish Cobra leader, said his wrongful conviction was part of a pattern of abuse on the city's Northwest Side by former Chicago Police Officer Reynaldo Guevara, authorities said.

In Johnson's case, at least three people who identified him in the murder later said they did so only after Guevara or others working with him told them to, his attorneys said. The $21 million award was the largest ever for a wrongful conviction in Chicago, his attorneys said.

In Saturday’s murder, a car pulled up alongside the SUV on its passenger’s side and someone inside opened fire, striking Vasquez in the neck and head, according to the captain, who said rounds also went through the vehicle and hit 32-year-old Leticia Vega -- who was sitting next to Vasquez -- in the chest.

The SUV was being driven by Myra DeLeon and 37-year-old Timothy Russell was a passenger, Buslik said, adding that DeLeon was not shot and drove the SUV to Saints Mary and Elizabeth Medical Center.

Authorities said Vega, who was seriously injured, was later transferred to another hospital for treatment.

Vasquez, of 2238 S. Kenilworth Ave. in Berwyn, was pronounced dead at Saint Elizabeth Medical Center at 7:27 a.m. Saturday, according to the Cook County Medical Examiner's office.

An autopsy Sunday determined Vasquez died of multiple gunshot wounds and his death was declared a homicide, according to the medical examiner’s office.

All the people inside the SUV had just returned from a social club when the shooting occurred and all are allegedly affiliated with the Spanish Cobra street gang, according to the captain, who said the slaying may have been a result of an ongoing feud between the Spanish Cobras and the Maniac Latin Disciples.

Police are seeking to speak to Johnson because his vehicle was involved in the incident, according to Buslik.

 

Why Wasn't The Juan Johnson Jury Told About His Gang Affiliation??

In reporting on the recent jury verdict received by Juan Johnson, the media is reporting that Johnson was a member of the Spanish Cobras street gang and was accused of beating and killing a member of the rival Latin Eagles street gang. Attorney Jim Sotos, who represented Reynaldo Guevara, a retired Chicago gang specialist, noted that "There were two witnesses who specifically testified that they saw [Juan Johnson] commit this murder. And the two [witnesses] that changed their story did so at the behest of gang leaders." Indeed, it was gang members who recanted their prior testimony and changed their story to claim that Guevara coerced them into identifying Johnson in the murder. Yet, the jury was not allowed to hear any evidence about gangs at all and was not told that the murder involved a fight between two rival gangs and that Johnson was a member of one of the gangs involved in the street brawl. Nor was the defense allowed to introduce evidence that the gang members changed their story in order to get back at Guevara, who was a Chicago Police gang specialist.
 

Juan Johnson Nabbed By FBI In Operation Snake Charmer

As previously reported, Juan Johnson, the man who recently was awarded $21 million in his civil rights lawsuit, was arrested last year as part of a drug sting on a Chicago street gang. Here' s a Chicago Tribune story about the bust. Tio Hardiman, director of mediation services at CeaseFire, where Johnson was allegedly working as a violence interrupter, is quoted saying "This comes as a total surprise." It probably comes as a total surprise to the jury in Johnson's case too, as they were not allowed to hear any evidence regarding Johnson's cocaine bust.  

Why Wasn't The Juan Johnson Jury Told About His Cocaine Arrest Last Year???

The jury in Juan Johnson's civil trial was not told that just last year Johnson, as part of a federal sweep of a Chicago street gang, was arrested and charged with being involved in the sale of crack cocaine. Johnson was set to plead guilty to that offense in March of this year but somehow managed to convince the United State's Attorney's Office to postpone his guilty plea until after his civil trial. Johnson obviously did not want the jury to hear evidence that was inconsistent with his claimed testimony of living his life on the straight and narrow. And why did the United State's Attorney's Office AGREE to the postponement?? Here is a copy of the motion Johnson filed requesting the continuance. Johnson managed to keep his crack cocaine offense from the jury, but at the same time managed to introduce evidence that Detective Guevara allegedly (according to who?) had a reputation for framing criminal suspects. Hardly seems fair . . .  

(Photo from LA Times Blog Post) 

Chicago Jury Awards Juan Johnson $21 Million In Alleged Wrongful Conviction Case

              

A federal jury in Chicago has awarded $21 million to Juan Johnson, who spent nearly 12 years in
prison for a murder he says he did not commit. Johnson was convicted with his brother of killing a man outside a Humboldt Park night club back in 1989 when Johnson was 19 years old. Johnson was sentenced to 30 years in prison. Johnson was able to convince the court to grant him a new trial and he was re-tried and acquitted in 2004. In his civil suit, Johnson claimed that Chicago detective Reynaldo Guevara framed him for the murder by convincing four witnesses to identify him. Johnson was represented by Jon Loevy from the law firm of Loevy & Loevy. Detective Guevara and the City of Chicago were represented by attorney Jim Sotos. THERE IS A LOT MORE TO THIS STORY . . . MORE TO FOLLOW 

Seventh Circuit reverses, in part, district court in Montano v. City of Chicago et. al., 06-2148

Here are the basic facts from this 1997 lawsuit:"Plaintiffs alleged flagrant mistreatment by Chicago police officers during and after the celebration of Mexican Independence Day in Chicago's Little Village neighborhood on September 14, 1997. The five plaintiffs were forcibly arrested and jailed following an altercation between officers and several celebrants on the corner of 25th and Whipple. The plaintiffs describe the incident as a violent police-initiated beating followed by illegal arrests and strip searches at the station house; the City and the officers deny any wrongdoing." Judge Der-Yeghiayan dismissed this case at trial as a sanction, when he found some of the plaintiffs committed perjury at trial. "The plaintiffs argue that the extreme sanction of dismissal was unwarranted in this case because the instances of perjury cited by the district court were merely ambiguities or innocent discrepancies in certain aspects of their testimony. They also argue the sanction unjustly punished Yesenia Mendez and David Mendez, neither of whom were accused of perjury in the officers' motion for sanctions." The Seventh Circuit held "the district court's order and the relevant portions of the record, does not support that the plaintiffs gave "false testimony concerning a material matter with the willful intent to provide false testimony, rather than as a result of confusion, mistake, or faulty memory." "By dismissing the case with prejudice, however, the district judge took the credibility question from the jury--and he did so on the basis of a paper record from a trial that was impermissibly cut short" The Seventh Circuit also reversed, in part, the granting of defendants motion for directed verdict - but upheld the granting of summary judgment by the City and certain named defendants. David Cerda represents the plaintiffs and Jim Sotos represents the defendants