In Response To Our Demands: Northwestern University Initiates Investigation Into The Medill Innocence Project

Ever since this case broke over a year ago, we have called upon Northwestern, many times, to investigate the work of the Medill Innocence Project and their handling of the Anthony McKinney case. Finally, that investigation will occur.  According to the Chicago Tribune: Northwestern has hired former U.S. attorney Anton Valukas to look into the project's investigation of the hotly contested case as well as other potential ethical violations by Protess and his students.  New allegations have surfaced that students were making secret recording of witness interviews, which under most circumstances is a violation of Illinois law.  

This is a step in the right direction.  At the same time, however, Northwestern and Medill's reluctance to disclose their entire investigation and comply with the State's Attorneys subpoena for over a year now has shed light on their mission to free McKinney.  If Medill and Northwestern actually believe that he is innocent - they would be doing everything possible to make sure he doesn't spend one more "unjust" day in prison.  From day one, they would have opened up their folders and records and claimed "we have nothing to hide" - they didn't.  For over a year now, they have sought to protect their own interests - not McKinney.  

Why is that?  

Judge Allows Northwestern To Toss Out The Controversial Evidence In The Anthony McKinney Case

As previously reported,  lawyers for McKinney sought to distance themselves from the students who allegedly used improper influence - paying and flirting  - over witnesses to get them to give statements that would exonerate McKinney.  

According to news reports, A judge today accepted a request from a man convicted of a 1978 murder to drop much of the controversial evidence pointing to his innocence that was dug up by Northwestern University journalism students. Judge Diane Gordon Cannon agreed to drop the evidence from a motion for a new trial filed by Anthony McKinney. She asked that McKinney sign an affidavit stating he understood the consequences, explaining that he is being treated in a psychiatric ward....The judge in the case has not yet ruled on the subpoena, but Karen Daniel, McKinney's lawyer, has said the more important issue at hand is whether her client was wrongfully convicted. Daniel said she believed dropping much of the questioned evidence would render moot the subpoena, but prosecutors have disagreed. They say all the evidence being used in the battle to get McKinney a new trial was part of the Medill Innocence Project's investigation.

We agree - the entire investigation is at issue. What is Northwestern trying to hide?