Northwestern University to David Protess: "We're Done With You"

The Chicago Tribune is reporting that David Protess, "whose Medill Innocence Project has been the pride of the prestigious journalism school" - has been asked to stop teaching classes in light of the misconduct that has occurred in the Anthony McKinney case.  As the Tribune explained: "At the center of the dispute are memos written by students during their investigation of the McKinney prosecution —documents Protess turned over to McKinney's lawyers at Northwestern Law School's Center on Wrongful Convictions so they could try to win his freedom. Led by Protess to believe that only limited information had been shared, university officials said, they spent almost a year and hundreds of thousands of dollars in legal expenses fighting prosecutors' bid for all the student records. But now Northwestern officials question whether Protess was forthcoming about what he turned over to McKinney's lawyers. That information was crucial because those materials should also have been given to prosecutors. In addition, a private lawyer hired by Northwestern to lead the court fight with prosecutors abruptly quit representing Protess in the matter last fall, accusing the professor of giving him inaccurate information about what student records had been turned over to McKinney's lawyers, according to documents recently obtained by the Tribune."

Finally, Northwestern was straight with Protess:  "We believe that you have displayed a lack of candor with us and have not cooperated with us," lawyer Richard O'Brien wrote Protess shortly before he withdrew from representing him, according to a copy of the e-mail. 

We need more candor from Protess about what happened in McKinney's case and what exactly is happening at Medill.  Northwestern's actions at this point are good, but long overdue.  In October and November of 2009, when the story broke, I called for Northwestern to take the State's Attorney's allegations seriously and work to clear the name of Medill and its students. Nothing happened.  I was then invited by WNUR (Northwestern's Radio Station) in December 2009  to a panel discussion with Northwestern professors, where I told them in person that the university should be investigating these allegations.  The professors dismissed my call for an investigation and were adamant that Protess should fight the subpoenas. A year later, its pretty clear that Protess is still hiding things and he is now being told to step down because of his actions.

Keep up the pressure Northwestern - this will only help the integrity of the university.    

Judge Allows Northwestern To Toss Out The Controversial Evidence In The Anthony McKinney Case

As previously reported,  lawyers for McKinney sought to distance themselves from the students who allegedly used improper influence - paying and flirting  - over witnesses to get them to give statements that would exonerate McKinney.  

According to news reports, A judge today accepted a request from a man convicted of a 1978 murder to drop much of the controversial evidence pointing to his innocence that was dug up by Northwestern University journalism students. Judge Diane Gordon Cannon agreed to drop the evidence from a motion for a new trial filed by Anthony McKinney. She asked that McKinney sign an affidavit stating he understood the consequences, explaining that he is being treated in a psychiatric ward....The judge in the case has not yet ruled on the subpoena, but Karen Daniel, McKinney's lawyer, has said the more important issue at hand is whether her client was wrongfully convicted. Daniel said she believed dropping much of the questioned evidence would render moot the subpoena, but prosecutors have disagreed. They say all the evidence being used in the battle to get McKinney a new trial was part of the Medill Innocence Project's investigation.

We agree - the entire investigation is at issue. What is Northwestern trying to hide? 

 

Northwestern's WNUR News To Air Forum On Students' Methods Of Investigating The McKinney Case - LIVE Tonight at 8PM

WNUR News - Northwestern University's student-run radio will be airing an open discussion tonight to address the allegations being made against the Medill Innocence Project. 

 As previously posted, the Cook County State's Attorney's Office has subpoenaed the journalism students for all their documents related to the Anthony McKinney investigation. The States Attorney is also see king the student's course outline and grade information.   The State has evidence that students paid witnesses in exchange for their testimony,  The Students, presumably, deny these allegations.  

The question tonight will be: Are the State's requests reasonable? Can the students legally hide behind a reporter's  privilege?  Should they be able to hide this information?  Can students pick and choose what information they disclose to prosecutors?  What are the implications of such actions? What does it say about the Medill Innocence Project? What's wrong with just putting all the cards on the table and seeking the truth? 

A lot of questions.....tune in tonight to hear the panelists weigh in. 

PANELIST BIOS:

Professor Jack Doppelt

Medill School of Journalism
Focuses on, among other topics, Law and Media Ethics

Mr. Avi T Kamionski

Associate of Andrew M. Hale Law Firm in Chicago
Concentrates practice in Civil Rights Litigation

Professor Laura Beth Nielsen

Director of Legal Studies Department, Northwestern
Associate Professor in the Department of Sociology
Research Fellow, American Bar Foundation