Michigan Prosecutor Wants To Question A Journalist, Peggy Lowe, And Several Law Students About Their Role In Gathering Evidence In The Dwayne Provience Case Showcased In This YouTube Video

Journalists and law students have been investigating criminal cases for years.  Much of their work has been used to convince judges to free prisoners convicted of serious crimes such as murder and rape.  For years, judges and prosecutors have accepted the evidence gathered by journalists and students and have never questioned the authenticity of their new evidence.  That is now starting to change.  In the last few months we have seen Cook County prosecutors subpoenaing student records - searching for why and how witnesses are changing their stories after all these years.  

Now, it appears this trend is moving to Michigan.  The metro times is reporting: that a Wayne County prosecutor wants University of Michigan Law School students to testify against a man they've been working to exonerate. Innocence Clinic co-director David Moran is asking Wayne County Circuit Judge Tim Kenny to strike the students from the witness list, as well as a journalist who sat in on some of the clinic sessions last year as part of a fellowship. Moran argued at a hearing Monday that the students have the same confidentiality privileges that lawyers have, and that assistant prosecutor Robert Stevens should not be able to call them to try to make his case. "What Mr. Stevens has requested would decimate our legal team," Moran said.

As part of their work with the Innocence Clinic, the students helped their professors last year convince Kenny to set aside Dwayne Provience's 2001 murder conviction. At the time, Wayne County Prosecutor Kym Worthy agreed evidence was withheld from Provience's defense at his trial and that he should be granted a new one. Kenny released the 36-year-old Detroit man from prison and scheduled a new trial for April 5. Provience had been serving a 30-to-60-year sentence for the March 2000 death of Rene Hunter, who was fatally gunned down at a northwest Detroit intersection. Police have said it was drug-related.

Stevens filed his witness list March 5, and it includes six students who have been enrolled or interned with the clinic, another law student who was present at witness interviews and a California journalist named Peggy Lowe. A writer for The Orange County Register, she was part of the prestigious Michigan journalism fellowship program last year, and attended clinic sessions and interviews.

At Monday's hearing, Stevens responded to Moran's objections to the students' possible testimony. Stevens said because the students have had statements published in newspapers, have interviewed Wiley and appeared in a YouTube video about the case, he should be able to call them to the witness stand. "All this is fair game," Stevens said in court. "I need to know the context of [Wiley's] conversations with each of these persons. Each one of those persons is a prosecution witness." Kenny requested a written argument from Moran due March 25, and scheduled a hearing for March 29. "I think I need you to brief this issue as to how, in effect, law students become attorneys for the duration of the entire trial," he said.

Scott Burns, executive director of the National District Attorneys Association, says the students' research raises interesting questions that could affect how far any confidentiality privilege extends. "Are they detectives? Are they investigators? Are they now inserting themselves into the criminal justice system, which is fine, but not necessarily as defense attorneys?" Burns asks. Roles other than as defense attorneys could make them prosecution witnesses, he says.

We will be following this story.  Hope to see more questioning going on.  Why after all these years and a couple of interviews by law students and journalists are witnesses recanting?  Whats the real story?  The students and the journalists should come clean.  Once again - we've said it before - if there is nothing to hide, than there is nothing to worry about - or is there......

 

Was Edwin Chandler's Conviction In The Brenda Whitfield Murder A Product Of Police Misconduct?

 

 

The Associated Press is reporting

Prosecutors are saying a Kentucky man who served about nine years in prison for a shooting death and robbery is innocent. Jefferson County Commonwealth's Attorney David Stengel said Tuesday that Edwin A. Chandler was innocent of the 1993 slaying of a convenience store clerk. Another man has been indicted in the killing. Chandler's attorney, Marguerite Thomas, says a fingerprint on a beer bottle at the scene, along with two witnesses who came forward, cleared Chandler. Chandler was paroled in 2002. Stengel offered his apologies, and said he hoped to help him receive restitution from the state.A judge overturned Chandler's conviction Tuesday afternoon. 

According to WAVE3 (NBC Affiliate) in Louisville KY

Chandler, 37, was convicted of killing Brenda Whitfield, a convenience store clerk, during a robbery on September 28, 1993. However, Tuesday another man, Percy Phillips, was charged in the case based on a fingerprint found at the scene.

Chandler was convicted partially based on a confession he says he was coerced into giving. Wednesday, the original detective on Chandler's case told WAVE 3 he never would coerce a suspect and only asked Chandler to tell the truth.

These early news reports don't tell the whole story.  What exactly did Chandler confess to? Is there an explanation for Percy Phillip's prints on the scene? Did Philips know Chandler? Even if the confession was false - was it caused by any police misconduct? 

Just a few months ago in Woodstock, Illinois, detectives were cleared of coercing a confession in the Gary Gauger case, even where the murders were linked to other individuals. 

We can't rush to any conclusions....There is more to the story...There always is.

 

Jury Rules In Favor Of Chicago Police In Porch Shooting Case

A state court jury returned a quick verdict in favor of Chicago police officers who shot and killed 39-year old Joseph Zagar on May 3, 2004. The officers shot Zagar after he refused to put down what the police thought was a gun but turned out to be a large battery pack. The case was defended by Thomas Samson of the City of Chicago Corporation Counsel's Office. Judge Elrod presided over the trial. More to follow.